Representing and Solving Hedonic Games with Ordinal Preferences and Thresholds
نویسندگان
چکیده
We propose a new representation setting for hedonic games, where each agent partitions the set of other agents into friends, enemies, and neutral agents, with friends and enemies being ranked. Under the assumption that preferences are monotonic (respectively, antimonotonic) with respect to the addition of friends (respectively, enemies), we propose a bipolar extension of the Bossong–Schweigert extension principle, and use this principle to derive the (partial) preferences of agents over coalitions. Then, for a number of solution concepts, we characterize partitions that necessarily (respectively, possibly) satisfy them, and identify the computational complexity of the associated decision problems. Alternatively, we suggest cardinal comparability functions in order to extend to complete preference orders consistent with the generalized Bossong– Schweigert order.
منابع مشابه
Fair and Square: Issues of Fairness and Computation in Partition Problems
This thesis deals with fair division of indivisible goods and with hedonic games. Both are vibrant fields in the multiagent systems and artificial intelligence community. Fair division of indivisible goods is concerned with the distribution of goods under possibly conflicting interests of agents, whereas hedonic games model issues of coalition formation. For fair division of indivisible goods, ...
متن کاملAltruistic Hedonic Games
Hedonic games are coalition formation games in which players have preferences over the coalitions they can join. All models of representing hedonic games studied so far are based upon selfish players only. Among the known ways of representing hedonic games compactly, we focus on friend-oriented hedonic games and propose a novel model for them that takes into account not only a player’s own pref...
متن کاملHedonic coalition nets
In hedonic games, players have the opportunity to form coalitions, and have preferences over the coalitions they might join. Such games can be used to model a variety of settings ranging from multi-agent coordination to group formation in social networks. However, the practical application of hedonic games is hindered by the fact that the naive representation for such games is exponential in th...
متن کاملComplexity of Hedonic Games with Dichotomous Preferences
Hedonic games provide a model of coalition formation in which a set of agents is partitioned into coalitions and the agents have preferences over which set they belong to. Recently, Aziz et. al. (2014) have initiated the study of hedonic games with dichotomous preferences, where each agent either approves or disapproves of a given coalition. In this work, we study the computational complexity o...
متن کاملar X iv : 1 10 5 . 18 24 v 2 [ cs . G T ] 3 D ec 2 01 1 Individual - based stability in hedonic games depending on the best or worst players ∗
We consider hedonic coalition formation games in which each player has preferences over the other players and his preferences over coalition structures are based on the best player (B-/B-hedonic games) or the worst player (W /W-hedonic games) in his coalition. We show that for B-hedonic games, an individually stable partition is guaranteed to exist and can be computed efficiently. Similarly, th...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015